• Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I knew about the relict popularion of mammoths that was still around. Wasn’t aware of the tigers. Can you please tell me more?

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I can’t 100% give you facts. I just go off of the rough estimate of fossil records for both mammoth and sabertooth tigers roughly and this is just a random thing I like to tell people when I was younger to kind of blow their mind.

  • Epistemophiliac@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Grostesques are mythical or fantastical creatures carved into the sides of building. If they have been designed to drain water away from the building, they are called gargoyles .

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    That REAL Pi actually ends at 7 digits. Discovered by a greengrocer named Dennis.

    There’s been an easy say to calculate it since 1800s using an abacus.

    Edit: thought the /s was implied with, you know, “Dennis.” I knew I should have gone with “Humperdink.”

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I would like to learn more about this. Wiki says:

      In the 5th century AD, Chinese mathematicians approximated π to seven digits, while Indian mathematicians made a five-digit approximation, both using techniques.

      So it looks like they were all approximations, but it actually is much longer like I was always taught.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    If presented with an old 1970-2000 era landline phone, I can call someone by rapidly hanging up in the pattern of their phone number.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      In case anyone is wondering, this is how old phones with rotary dials worked: you wound the dial to the digit you needed and the built-in mechanism would automatically wind it back; as it did it would momentarily disconnect the line as it passed each digit generating pulses that the exchange would count. If you still live somewhere where landline phones exist odds are this still works because the exchange maintains backwards compatibility with pulse dialling.

      Up until about twenty years ago virtually every supermarket had a phone by the checkouts with a single pre-programmed button for a local taxi company; we used this trick all the time to call home, our mates, etc.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I am pretty sure I could do it sans phone and only the handle, by rapidly pulling the plug out of the socket and putting it back in.

      Never thought to try it when I had the chance.

  • Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    An electric eel is not an eel.
    A mountain goat is not a goat.
    A maned wolf is not a wolf.
    A mountain chicken is not a chicken.

    Also, there is an animal called the Headless Chicken Fish.

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Also, there is an animal called the Headless Chicken Fish.

      Let me guess; it’s a species of antelope.

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I know how to fix the entire world.

    Everything flawlessly. Human satisfaction at all time highs.

    So much so that the largest problem that humanity would face is the ennui of not knowing what to do with itself.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      As to why this is a useless fact:

      Even if I’m 100% correct, nobody wants to hear it.

      No one will work with me to accomplish these things.

      All this knowledge does is add misery to my own life, knowing that I could make things better if only.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Ok, I’ll bite. What’s the quick summary of your idea?

        Of course I’m skeptical, I think there must be at least one major issue keeping it from having happened already, but also curious.

        • bizarroland@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Uh, I mean I could probably write a 30 or 40 page manifesto explaining it, but what it boils down to is the main bottleneck in human society is resource management combined with a lack of vision and purpose.

          Anything above the level of the family has resources, needs, and uses that are being managed by people that are ultimately too selfish, too greedy, and not interconnected enough to work together.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            Sure, but what do you propose to manage said resources?

            So far planned economies haven’t gone well in practice. (Not that the unplanned type is great either)