Buage_@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoyoutube shorts bingomedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up195arrow-down110
arrow-up185arrow-down1imageyoutube shorts bingomedia.piefed.socialBuage_@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squareosanna@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 months agoi never got the point of shorts. they’re so short, they can’t cover anything of any substance. I’d rather watch a full video.
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoIt’s good for short skits, but that’s about it imo
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 months agoThat’s because shortcuts are narratively complete (usually). Many shorts are just clips, and incomplete, therefore unsatisfying.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoSome song ideas can be conveyed in 1 min, like the dirt man.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI’ve started watching shorts when I’m eating breakfast alone and want entertainment that can be easily interrupted so I can do something productive before I leave.
i never got the point of shorts. they’re so short, they can’t cover anything of any substance. I’d rather watch a full video.
It’s good for short skits, but that’s about it imo
That’s because shortcuts are narratively complete (usually). Many shorts are just clips, and incomplete, therefore unsatisfying.
Some song ideas can be conveyed in 1 min, like the dirt man.
I’ve started watching shorts when I’m eating breakfast alone and want entertainment that can be easily interrupted so I can do something productive before I leave.