• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s been a while since I read something that made me feel as uncomfortable as that article did. Gross.

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              It is life and very simple, but it also sucks. It’s a type of cell that can’t do its purpose − become multicellular, gestate in a uterus wall and turn into a mammal − but can do all defining functions of life (eat, move, produce copies of itself). Still, it’s not as good at moving and eating as bacteria, and unviable in natural conditions.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It gets destroyed by the people who created it because by then, it has shown that the sperm was viable. It could form a colony in favorable conditions, which are not naturally occurring outside mammals.

        • mika_mika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a horrible ethical argument. It has about as much logic as anal sex being legitimate before marriage because of the loophole of it not being traditional penetration. Just have sex. Just use viable human cells. Who cares.

        • Shave_MyBeever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          In the related articles, there’s a link to the Hamster zona-free ovum test where this snippet lies:

          Although medical professionals often present the procedure as unable to create an embryo,[5] these claims are not technically correct. If the human sperm succeeds in penetrating the hamster egg, a hybrid embryo is indeed created, known as a humster.[6] These embryos are typically destroyed before they divide into two cells; were they left alone to divide, they would still be unviable.[7]

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know why people are freaking out over this article. It’s pretty well known that lots of animals (especially within their own class) have eggs that can be fertilized by different species. It doesn’t matter like 99.99% of the time because the resulting cell is unviable and will not develop into anything because the merged DNA is incompatible and will fail to generate into a developed organism.

      The exception to this are hybrids (like a mule), rare cases where similar enough species can actually create a viable fetus, but the resultant hybrid is usually sterile and unable to reproduce its own offspring: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_(biology)

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is something that I would liked to have gone my whole life without knowing about. Thanks for that.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’d pronounce it in English about the same as I pronounce hamster in Estonian. Just based off how it’s written and ignoring how human is pronounced.