nah. I’m very much a ‘real’ fan and the movie was great. it certainly wasn’t technically accurate, but if you relax and take the movie for what it is; you’ll have a fun time :)
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
yeah i agree that the computer screen doesn’t make sense. but like it’s not a dead giveaway imo. like if this picture was organic, maybe these people chose an image that didn’t make technical sense because it wasn’t too important for the photos composition. you know what i mean? like this is scary close to being indistinguishable from some old photograph and i hate it :p
is it though? looks like it’s reflecting the camera flash to me
i see the watermark but is this actually a generated image? I’m normally good at being able to tell. this image feels fine to me though? like the reflections on the light switch cover and on the picture frame feel natural. the keyboard looks correct. i guess the vents on the slightly stubbly crt are a bit wonky and the calendar can’t decide between 1998 and 1958 lol
…or as I’ve recently taken to calling them: the Trump + Epstein files
i can’t explain it either, but i can tell a Mickey post before i read the username :p
correction: it’s a cube with gaben on it
swagmoney@lemmy.cato
News@lemmy.world•‘America, uh...First!’: ICE to buy $7.2m worth of Canadian armored personnel carriers
9·4 months agooops i may have manufactured wiring harnesses for these vehicles sorry guys 😞
ah yes the correct way and the Minecraft way
334 trillion trillion watts!


they’re about 18 bucks after tax where I’m from