

You continue with the insult responses because you don’t have a point.


You continue with the insult responses because you don’t have a point.


My posts are almost always based on logic. I do not engage in insult posts, like you did.


Your intolerant ad-hominem post offers no constructive rebuttal of a good-faith argument and should be deleted by the mods.


Imagine a circumstance in which you have to use your real ID to sign up for a social media site
You’re setting up a false premise. It doesn’t have to be done that way.
“omg thats so cool, can i bring my kids to watch and maybe they can try?”
Context is everything. “The Bible: In the Beginning” (1966) contains a long fully nude Adam & Eve scene, but schools were encouraged to send kids to see it. My school did. But nudity in movies was very rare in 1966 and such a scene would normally have been prohibited by government censorship if not for the biblical framing.


Is removing digital privacy really something we want to be flirting with?
Digital privacy and anonymous posting are two different things.


Women simply prefer spaces where they can control the membership and replies to ensure validation of their beliefs. You’d be surprised by how censorious women spaces can be. Posting replies on their spaces is never egalitarian. And women have no problem brigading either.


The 2:1 ratio of course just degrades the platform
Men and women have different interest. It’s mostly a fantasy to expect 50/50 participation.


They don’t want experienced, knowledgable, self-confident partners. They want naive young women
You’ve obviously never lived with the aftermath of dating worn out, bitter and combative women who have been traumatized by their numerous “experiences.” Men like inexperienced women precisely because they want to mold her and give her her first experiences. Also, “experienced” women are more likely to be single moms.
As an American I mostly use MM-DD-YY, but I occasionally use YYYY.MM.DD if I want to sort.
I doubt anyone today eats a whole chicken for lunch.


Would have been a more useful list if OP had excluded eating, since humans can be killed by eating almost everything not intended as food.


Another poster informed me that the Planet Fitness incident is not the one discussed in the OP article, which is from Texas.


Thank you for the correction. The Planet Fitness incident was so widely reported and discussed that I assumed it was the only such widely known controversy.


The pic and its controversy involved Planet Fitness. That’s why the pic matches a Google search with Planet Fitness.


Do a Google image search for “planet fitness trans locker room.” Fortunately, the pic is entirely G-rated.


SHE saw a cis male washing his hands in a female locker room. He made absolutely zero effort to look female. His transgenderism effort was totally declarative. Have you seen the pic?


TBF, the woman who took the pic thought she was providing evidence to a crime.
If he was cremated, he’s black now.
You’ve obviously never seen cremated remains.
I love watching credible conspiracy theories turn into pure garbage conspiracy theories right before my eyes in one thread.