Again, almost no Christians hate other people. Jew, Muslim, Gay, Queer, etc there is no hate. Not approving of the lgbt lifestyle is not hate.

Every presidency since FDR at the very least has become increasingly more left leaning. Heck, Trump is more liberal than Bush Jr was and Biden was basically USSR lite.

Except if you look at all of Christian history and all of Christian doctrine you would understand that it’s not the No True Scotsman fallacy. It’s literally against all of what Jesus taught. He went so far as to teach that hating someone is equivalent to killing them. Just because some people choose to claim Christianity and do non-Christian things does not negate the core of Christianity.

No Christian wants gay people killed. Maybe someone cosplaying as a Christian, but no Christians. It’s against all Christian doctrines.

No. The government is the problem. They enable everyone to act in their own worst interests.

Homophobic does not equal wanting you dead. Muslims are the only one in the majority that want gays to be killed. Jews and Christians tolerate LGBT peoples.

So, you’re anti-Muslim? Or just anti an extremely small minority of Christians that the MSM tells you is everyone who disagrees with you?

I guarantee you that it’s both the left and the right.

Thanks Trump! Best president ever!

Removed by mod

That’s what I said. LOL

Removed by mod

Yep

On the hopes that you’re not just being sarcastic,

Socialism fundamentally works by creating a system that taxes those who have more than others and goes to those who have less than others. Theoretically this can work forever because the tax revenue is being spent on the betterment of the society and as long as the majority of people are giving more than they receive. The problems arise when people start to take more than they give. This can happen from a number of factors like someone who pays $15,000/year into the system but then takes $1,000,000 for cancer treatment or someone who can contribute chooses not to and still receives the benefits.

In relation to the last panel, they are saying that they are giving 85% of their labor value to their boss who doesn’t work. There’s multiple problems with this way of thinking. The first and most obvious one is the 85%, which is just an arbitrarily large number to make it feel scary. Second is the claim that the boss (and one can assume owner) doesn’t do any work. That’s obviously not true because 99.99% (I’m being dramatic) of owners work an equal or greater number of hours per week than the rest of the employees. And there’s also the fact that while needing to know how every aspect of the company operates the owner is the one who takes the biggest risks and has the most at stake so it makes sense that they make more than the new hire who has no work experience. Yes, you’ll have owners who take more than they “need” but you also have to remember that technically all costs of the company can and are taken out of the owners paycheck because the lower profit the company makes the lower the owners paycheck can be.

Hope this helps.

Because OP knows big words but doesn’t understand economics.

Let me guess OP, you got a C- in Economics?