Yeah I think the route of Norway makes more sense. Prohibition failed historically multiple times. I think education and factful discussions (pros/cons) without irrational condemning drugs would actually be a sustainable long term solution for addiction (because let’s face it, it’s mostly about unhealthy addiction).

Just legalise all kinds of substances without e.g. ads and other measures that effectively reduce the issue. And give proper education early (ideally from long term addicts, so that it’s believable and properly shows the issues).

We see with weed, opiates and currently growing cocaine where uncontrolled markets go and promote addiction…

I doubt that this will be much different with tobacco in a prohibited future…

I only trust math with my data (i.e. encryption…)

Removed by mod

In the end dosage is very relevant and of course even more important: set and setting

I do think acid is more homogeneous and easier to dose appropriately though (YMMV) But the length of a trip can make it challenging.

Do heroic doses of either, shrooms for me result in more body load and are more introspective chaotic/mystic. Acid more energetic/clearer/“Neon” wider headspace. But in the end setting is what I think is most important for how the trip plays out (I had my best and worst trip on shrooms).

and/or desaturated to further enforce the effect…

It’s not even communist. Western Propaganda really created a false impression on this term…

I don’t think we really had communism yet on the world.

Yep, (social) media is optimized in fueling your emotions, and well the strongest emotions are negative, so it’s mostly optimized towards that.

Avoiding this, doing something more healthy leads to a better mental (and likely physical as it’s connected) health IMO/IME.

Yeah I think I recently have read here on Lemmy that the amygdala is bigger for MAGA, so I think the opposite is true indeed.

Which would also make more sense, because of all the irrational anxieties those scum has…

Yeah obviously, that’s why I said additionally to the other answers.

I mean downloads basically limited by your bandwidth, usually the highest quality (like blu-ray rip 4k, almost no compression) etc.

But if you don’t have issues, well probably don’t bother.

Another thing if you aren’t using a VPN (which you probably should), they’re safer, as well… they’re private.

Additionally to the other answers, take a look at stremio with Torrentio. A few of my friends use it (I’m using a private tracker), it’s basically as convenient as using Netflix AFAICS.

Don’t wanna be that guy, but: You misspelled Microslop.

reasonably well

hmm not in my experience, if you don’t care about code-quality you can quickly prototype slop, and see if it generally works, but maintainable code? I always fall back to manual coding, and often my code is like 30% of the length of what AI generates, more readable, efficient etc.

If you constrain it a lot, it might work reasonably, but then I often think, that instead of writing a multi-paragraph prompt, just writing the code might’ve been more effective (long-term that is).

plan it correctly and the actual implementation of the correct plan will take no time at all.

That’s why I don’t think AI really helps that much, because you still have to think and understand (at least if you value your product/code), and that’s what takes the most time, not typing etc.

it‘s just different.

Yeah it makes you dumber, because you’re tempted to not think into the problem, and reviewing code is less effective in understanding what is going on within code (IME, although I think especially nowadays it’s a valuable skill to be able to review quickly and effectively).

Unfortunately it’s a general theme in Open Source. I lost almost all motivation for programming in my free-time because of all these AI-slop(-PRs). It’s kinda sad, how that Art (among others) is flooded with slop…

And feet. Athlete’s foot is a thing, wearing the same kind of shoes all the time doesn’t help with moisture.

Edit: just read the last three words… Well at least now there’s an explanation why it’s bad for feet.

Yes, and blending in between, including RGB, can enhance the quality of light as well to estimate a natural light source.

There’s various metrics, like CQS, CRI or newer versions of it.

It’s basically about how close the wavelength spectrum is compared to a black-body radiator given a color temperature (e.g. an incandescent lamp or the sun).

Though IME, the light quality of a real white LED is better than the mix of an RGB led. Also interesting: the cooler the LED is the higher the quality of the light.

No it’s not entirely clearly defined. But a few elements appear in all of them: Anti- communism/socialism, dictator, far-right idiologies, nationalism…

I wouldn’t say any if these are desired by leftism, or rather opposites.

Welcome to Rust which “solves” this issue…

Yeah it takes more time than a quick and dirty python script. But when I’m counting the countless hours (what irony) into this equation because of mindless leaky abstractions and resulting debugging, I’m certain that I’m at least not a lot slower writing that. As I said I’m not talking about the last 10-20% of performance that’s possible say even up to 40%, but more like an order of magnitude (at least), i.e. algorithmically insufficient or relying too much on that your abstractions do everything right and you use it correctly (which in the case of react is seemingly not the case, when looking at the modern web).

Taking that example (Rust) again, I very often get away with .clone() everywhere, i.e. not even caring much about performance while the performance is not significantly impacted. Then I switch to our typescript code-base in my job and get aggressions because of this extreme slowness (because of stupid abstractceptions, like wtf? shadcn needs to be built on radix-ui needs to be built on react etc. which in effect results in a slow abstraction-hell… and leaky abstractions everywhere)