

Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.


Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.


Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect
The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn’t want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.


I mean this feels like an obvious result. Are we thinking this is ground breaking?
Like comparing 3 ways of making a table, hand tools, power tools or paying someone to make it for you. Then asking which required the most effort.
I mean I know it’s important to confirm even expected results but this feels so intuitive.


Now this is a proper answer, thank you.


I’m not assuming anything. I’m asking a question about why the official, legal route can be bypassed.


More importantly does Tim Cook know he’s Ellen DeGeneres?

This is my ~8 month old work laptop.
Is a Dell.
2 usb c not pictured.
You have options.
I’d say she is a social democrat.
… but to most Americans that is far left and thus labelled socialism because America is a very right wing country. Even the ‘left’ in America is basically a right wing party in most other western democracies.