The quad ‘rest of the fire’ images, lol
ObjectivityIncarnate
- 0 Posts
- 55 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Doesn’t retroactively make the show any less funny, and this post is not any sort of endorsement of him; if it was, that would at least serve as a reason to comment the way you did, as a response.
This just comes off as empty virtue signaling.
6·25 days agothe multimillionaires
Why would any of them do this instead of charity donation that they can deduct from their taxable income?
There is no actual sentiment in the image, lol. On its face, it’s just stating two facts, not explicitly criticizing anything.
One could feasibly spread the exact same image as a positive thing, just depends on the audience.
$74,250 per employee
Hm, is this low for this line of work? Genuinely asking.
You’re welcome!
wanting to sound like an adult when making a genuine criticism is bootlicking
???
- The fact that “mocking terms” is even in your ‘playbook’ to begin with, speaks volumes about you.
- Acting like “y’all” is a component of some high-minded satire is genuinely hilarious. Who do you think you’re kidding?
You’re going to enjoy this, I think (ignore the titles of the videos, this is definitely what @maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone was referring to, and the context makes the bit about WWW so much better:
Each more pathetic than the last, it’s always a hallmark of an infantile mind not worth engaging with, in my experience.
Mature adults can talk about people they don’t like without this stupid playground nonsense.
Asinine ‘doodyhead’-tier ‘nicknames’ for people you don’t like are never appropriate, once you’ve reached a double-digit age. Grow up.
23·3 months agoThat’s a straw man, so I’m not going to bother responding beyond pointing out the fallacy. Consider engaging with what I actually said.
No. Also I specifically used the ‘90% of their income’ figure and not the 95% one shortly mentioned thereafter, because I think it’s fair that even those who are struggling the most ought to be able to have some ‘fun’ with their money.
But most people do earn enough to pay for their necessities, have fun, and save. And many people don’t save for later, even though they easily can, in the name of putting more on the ‘fun’ pile.
14·3 months agoGetting the Orange Box for $10 back in the day has to be my all-time best.
deleted by creator
It’s relevant context to know that while about 67% of people self-report that they are living “paycheck to paycheck” (meaning they are not actively saving any money), only 30% self-report that they are actually spending more than 90% of their income on necessities.
Point being that the majority of people who aren’t actively saving, are choosing not to, spending all of their extra income instead of saving at least some of it.
As bad as conditions are overall, a significant chunk of people are making it needlessly worse for themselves, and things are not quite as dire as they’re made to seem by sensationalist media that’s quick to report that 67% figure, but never focuses on the 30% one that’s a much better indicator of the percentage of people who are actually having trouble making ends meet.
You know, just leave “amazing” out of the headline if you’re gonna put single quotes around it, lol…it reads sarcastic.
So, did you not read the comment to the end, or are you just equal parts smug and dishonest?
Meme was made by a space shuttle tile.