They are great, I use InputLeap regularly. But the things mentioned in the post transfer video as well, which is a different use case. The synergy family of tools allows to share input devices with another machine, but not use it as a second screen for software on the first system. Depending on the goal, one can work around that with network file systems and having the same software installed on both PCs.

This basically amounts to a key/interaction logger in the IDE. I’d suspect this would prevent many people contributing to projects using something like that, at least I wouldn’t install such a plug-in.

What exactly would you checksum? All intermediate states that weren’t committed, and all test run parameters and outputs? If so, how would you use that to detect an LLM? The current agentic LLM tools also do several edits and run tests for the thing they’re writing, then edit more until their tests work.

So the presence of test runs and intermediate states isn’t really indicative of a human writing code and I’m skeptical that distinguishing between steps a human would do and steps an LLM would do is any easier or quicker than distinguishing based on the end result.

Even counting all who voted for them, as the voter turnout was 64%. I’m not sure how much of the population 100% would be with that voter registration system the US has (is 100% all registered voters or all that could in theory register), but even if 100% was all the population, it would only be around 35% MAGA voters

On the one hand, I’m all for having it configurable per app. But there should also be a global default, so that one doesn’t need to set it for each program. The current proposal sounds as if I would need to activate it once in the compositor (Gnome) and then separately in Firefox. It should probably be centrally handled by the compositor (not sure if this is possible, don’t know how primary selection works on Wayland).

In most programs, you can paste the primary selection with Shift+Insert

I know, my point is just that less people notice that they can also nominate than that they can vote on the finalists, because the latter is promoted more.

Probably yes. But the final voting is advertised on the store front page and usually during the winter sale, sometimes with things like getting cards or such stuff for voting, in addition to the pop-up. At least for me it seems more prominent in the interface than the nominations

Nomination is less prominently advertised in Steam compared to the voting itself, but you can nominate any game for an award via its store page. If I hear of it before it is over, it’s usually because the devs of some game I’m playing are asking for nominations, I don’t remember it being advertised on the store frontpage.

Well, having a domain is basically documenting your IP publicly. It’s not that risky.