

42 in the image, 65 in the series. I think the whole of the 30k/40k universe is up to more than 300 books now though, it’s insane.
Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.


42 in the image, 65 in the series. I think the whole of the 30k/40k universe is up to more than 300 books now though, it’s insane.


Yeah, I really respect what a literary undertaking it was but… jesus christ, when the recommended reading order has to come in the form of charts like this maybe you should prune down the number of entries in the series guys.


Oh jeeze yeah, Brutal Kunnin’ was so much fun. I still have yet to pick up most of the other Ork ones, I remember Prophet of the WAAAAGH! being another one that’s just a genuinely good piece of sci-fi. Still have yet to read the Red Gobbo books, really need to get around to that one of these days. Savoring the good fiction, I suppose…


Flight of the Eisenstein is pretty good too. But… none of the HH books have ever really grabbed me. 40k has some truly good pieces of science fiction (The Infinite and The Divine (probably the best warhammer book, I don’t even think that’s a contentious claim), Ruin/Reign, Flesh & Steel, Assassinorum: Kingmaker), but I was always kinda underwhelmed by the 30k stuff… idk what it was. Maybe the inevitability of the setting?


No skin in the argument, I just came to the comments trying to find the study because that link is broken for me. If it’s working for you, would you mind linking it here? I can’t find the specific one being referenced thru the miasma of google being absolute garbage and it being a recent enough publication that the academic DBs I have access to seemingly don’t have that issue yet.

You’re being sanctimonious again.
Nah, I was just being sarcastic. You were being a troll, it seemed fair. That said, ‘Sanctimonious’ (“Righteousness accompanied by an unwarranted attitude of moral or social superiority”) is how you’re behaving now. I never implied any superiority over other commenters, just that they haven’t expressed any condemnation of him in favor of discussing his work with a concerning amount of detachment - and that I’m concerned about the social realities that leads to that being normalized. It’s concerning, especially because as others have pointed out the fame that came from him being a terrorist has buried discussion about the work of the much better philosophers he (charitably) synthesized his ideas from.
It’s rather depressing that that’s what you consider brave, but I’ll take the compliment.
I’m not sure it’s unwarranted to explicitly condemn the unabomber here, though. People are unironically praising him in these comments - if condemnation was as obvious as you implied you would have much stronger grounds on which to call me sanctimonious, but right now there’s plenty of people arguing the effectiveness of what he did in distributing his message and nobody that’s yet pointed out that he was a literal terrorist.
Given the 2:1 ratio on that comment it seems like it actually is a contentious opinion. Maybe the backlash is all due to it being interpreted as virtue signaling, but… there’s so many comments in here unironically praising Ted for his ideas and refraining from commenting on his later actions (or actively justifying them as ex: a way to be taken seriously).


Anyone got a link to the leaks? Would love to know what he spends his time emailing about instead of doing his job
Can you point at your hands?


You’re not missing anything, the article is a wild misrepresentation of how nation-state finances work. This piece is pretty transparently pro-austerity/conservative funding bill propaganda.


Yeah, and that tendency is directly addressed in the policy.
ohh, mr hands. Classic, yeah… yikes.
As an exhibitionist I approve, as a person who gets cold no way am I wearing sheer fabrics on the daily. My fuckin’ nipples would freeze off…
Wait, what story? It’s a damn good safeword, very meta-humor…


Like, say, a candle?


Spelling/grammar checking and machine translation have been in use for decades on wikipedia, the only difference is that AI has improved the usefulness of the tools for first-pass editing. I don’t believe the policy has even changed - you still had to be fluent in the language if you were using the old style MTL tools, too.
Aside from generating videos of young girls with gigantic titties, this is the only thing generative AI is actually useful for.


Just to put the scale of this into context, the strike on the girl’s school wasn’t the first thing they did, those three strikes were among the first 700 strikes carried out on day one (1200 in the first 36 hours).
Ye…eah, that seems like a bit of “doing something wrong” to be actively regressing on personal freedoms.