Nothing against you, but especially the last paragraph reads like the stuff I remember being said about a certain richest man in the world back then.

That’s what you normally do with chain shot. Unless that was the joke, of course.

Thing is, the cannon ball IS the pressure valve. And since one of them will invariably go faster than the other one, the whole thing will be even less unpredictable with one half of the chain still in the barrel

Carfule question: Could it be that the reason the workes unionised is the same reason as to why Ubisoft closed it down?

If things were looking bad, it makes sense to unionise. if Ubisoft was going to shut down sooner or later anyway, might as well do it when the studio votes to unionise, as closing it down later would only become more difficult.

No, you don’t understand, those were violent, drug-dealing fascist ursurpers seeking to undermine glorious nation!

Why not go somewhere the government ist not elected then?

I assure you, this is not an irrational fear. A year or so ago, the only German political party with a major presence on tik tok was the afd, a far-right to extremist party.

They still dominate an enormous share of political discourse on this platform. Arguably thanks to help from the platforms creator, but also because they were uncontested. The platform most teenagers use.

And one party might remain on twitter and have a tremendous advantage in reach over all others.

I think it was due to someone gossiping about that, but yeah that’s the only unpleasent background I could find in that article. The paragraph even ends on a positive note.

I just dislike it if people throw around a source as an argument without constructing their argument.

I have read it and it is not clear to me what exactly they wish to say.

Now, personally I don’t care but if they were to elaborate on what they mean I would read and maybe understand their argument.

Edit: they instead of you

Do you care to elaborate?