Debating, not arguing. Not a troll. Engaging in the topic, and you just don’t like to hear views opposed to yours. I only resort to ad hominem attacks when they’re used against me. You started the disrespect in what was otherwise a respectful conversation. It is you who is a dick. I’m sure you’re aware and enjoying it very much.
You sound like that bird that sticks their heads in the sand whenever they hear something that scares them.
I don’t know, do artists credit Hewlett Packard for the computer they used, or GIMP for the software they use? Is it normal to credit all the tools used when someone makes art?
Because it’s a topic about separating creations from the creator. It’s perfectly topical and cromulent.
It doesn’t operate in a vacuum. It’s a tool. There is an operator of the tool, and it takes skill to get the output desired.
Thanks for proving my point, though.
Thanks for proving my point.
No one had the idea, tweaked the input, or carefully wrote a prompt. The person operating the tool doesn’t exist, you’re right.
Apparently not. Even good AI art is “slop” according to the majority here.
It means shit has been posted.
deleted by creator
Yes, we are the hive mind, with a singular, unbroken opinion that none may disagree with. All must hate.
No matter how the technology improves. No matter what they accomplish with it. Hate is everything. Hate is all we have and all we will ever have.
Referring to technological progress as slop is being very predictably monotonous. AI isn’t exclusively a black box. There are tunings and imposed considerations that can be made so the AI DOES know about anything it needs to. The technology is only in preview form, and you seemingly expect immediate perfection, rather than incremental progress.
I haven’t seen any negative response to DLSS5 except by people who literally only see timeless, unerring holy art when they look at anything. IDK who thinks making games visually enhanced over the artist’ limited tools/time/abilities is a deterioration.
Ew, that links to Twitter.
You should avoid the FuckAI community - they hate hearing that this application of the technology is wholly viable. To them, it’s only capable of creating crap, and to suggest otherwise is to be buried in a mountain of down votes. I was actually surprised you had a positive reaction, until I realized this is the Technology community.
This is the “post-mortem”: https://ba.antheas.dev/bazzite-postmortem.html
I installed it on my Lenovo Legion Go, as a recommendation from Google Gemini after the fallout from Bazzite. It has gone well overall, with only a handful of issues (controllers not detected, SD card mounted as an SSD, screen not always turning on, Bluetooth headset connecting at low quality, WiFi dropping signal) that were all solved with a few minutes of querying AI and running the recommended commands in Konsole. Without AI, though, I’d have been lost.
I don’t know why someone down voted you, but I also don’t know what you mean by my math. Which math would that be? I was using AI before LLMs ever even hit the scene.
What tools do you have experience with? Just the free ones? The crap from Microslop or OpenAI? I sincerely believe you’d change your opinion if you were using the professional products from companies that have created working models, but I imagine most people only have limited experience with those models, if any. Most use ChatGPT or Copilot and surmise it’s all inaccurate crap. They’d be right from that limited sample, but wrong about the market at large.
That’s why you still need one skilled developer per project as the middle man, for requirement elicitation. You don’t have to believe me, no skin off my nose, but I’m with an organization that’s making it work exactly as described. Months of work done in weeks instead.
Tell me you’ve never purposefully created art using AI without telling me.