Nor does it prevent him from being one

Something? You think? You were talking like you knew

Jitsi Meet would be the first one I think of.

That’s how they’d love everyone to think. Violent response gives pretext to drive the jackboot in. If you try to go to pick a fight on a force with a monopoly on violence, you’ll get yourself killed and embolden them.

Successful overthrows happen when elites break ranks, when organised alternatives exist, when military, police and bureaucracy take another option.

Organise peaceful protest, appeal to those in power rather than threatening them, and make the alternative more attractive than the status quo.

Zac Bowden used to post a video for every single new insider build of Windows to cover any change he could, he’s bought the original Surface table from 2007, he’s been covering and championing all things Windows for at least a decade. To get someone like him off side, you really gotta be fucking the dog.

I know that the market verdict is “eh who cares”, but I really dont think anyone should think that invasive kernel-level anticheat is at all acceptable.

I used it for a while. It worked great.

If they were going to get enshittified, they should’ve been smarter about it to gradually introduce lock-in. The switching cost of going to Jellyfin is almost zero. Did it in an afternoon about a year ago. Ya done goofed, Plex

I don’t know why this is getting down voted. With regulation and healthy competition, this is what happens. When antitrust regulation is weak, R&D and innovation stops and rent seeking takes its place.

Anyone hear a loud hissing sound?