Yes, I think it’s important to consider how extreme the situation was. You mentioned the external conditions. It’s also fair to say that it’s difficult to do the right thing in an emergency of this magnitude. We know he handled it badly but we’re not freezing on a mountain at midnight with our exhausted girlfriend.
Ah, whataboutism. How cunning. I’m done with you.
Exactly. Privatize the profits and socialize the costs. What a brilliant system. Unfortunately it benefits only a small handful while everyone else picks up the tab.
Thanks professor. Do you know private debt and state debt are hardly the same? Have you considered the opportunity cost of not having public energy, therefore losing potential “earnings” to private investors? Or are you telling me next that rich people are a necessity as well? Is trickle-down part of this course or do I have to wait for 201?
This has little to do with where you’re from. It’s just neoliberal rhetoric. Having a public energy sector would be beneficial in the long run and would reduce what we have to pay for it. Right now the earnings are privatized in most places.
That’s incorrect. Nuclear power is one of the more expensive options when you factor in the costs after operation ends, which you should obviously do.
That’s a tough call. Sounds to me that it was reckless to climb the mountain under those conditions but both decided to go ahead. Nevertheless, the reaction of the accused to the emergency is bad. Calling the police and then putting his phone on silent makes little sense. Leaving her to “get help” is of course futile.
I’m not disagreeing with you and an independent Hong Kong would’ve been nice but I’m talking about realistic options. Even without any military action Hong Kong was and remains dependent on China and I don’t see how it could survive without it.
It obviously sucks and the outcome was to be expected but what alternative would you propose?
Continued British control would have meant maintaining territory acquired through the Opium Wars which China considered illegitimate. Given China’s position and growing power that likely would have required serious military confrontation. From a post-colonial perspective extending colonial rule also seems hard to justify. What alternative outcome do you think was realistically achievable under those conditions?
Nice, I’ll steal this one. My girlfriend will be very annoyed.
Is it a good read? I’m intrigued.
Yes. I assume you mean Sofia? She has eight neighbors in total, two she shares with Igor. Both are innocent according to Tom.
There is also a tutorial which helped me a lot.
Gabe: Column A is the only column with exactly 3 criminals.
Peter: There are 5 innocents neighboring Tom.
Given this combination we know that Bruce is innocent because either Sofia or Wanda have to be a criminal and because there cannot be exactly 3 criminals in column B: Bruce is innocent.
I copied my answer. I don’t know what you mean by glitch. The puzzle works with the given information.
Gabe: Column A is the only column with exactly 3 criminals.
Peter: There are 5 innocents neighboring Tom.
Given this combination we know that Bruce is innocent because either Sofia or Wanda have to be a criminal and because there cannot be exactly 3 criminals in column B: Bruce is innocent.
With the information that Peter (D3) and Gabe (B2) provided, it’s clear that Bruce has to be innocent.
Oh and cool drawing, btw. Most art inspired by this game was a bit too much for me but this one is nice.
This game is just so good. Finished the DLC recently and it was a blast. Easily in my Top 5.
I’m afraid that’s too far up north. It’s apparently a huge island!
Most of my thirsts are not hard-earned but the music is catchy. I’ll give it a go, thank you.
That’s kind of funny. Nuclear energy is actually getting more expensive:
Source
A few reasons come to mind:
There are probably more reasons. I would of course not compare it to coal but to renewables. They’re the future. Storage will be needed but those options are also getting cheaper by the day.