Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agoHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldimagemessage-square452linkfedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down1147
arrow-up1913arrow-down1imageHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square452linkfedilink
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·16 days agoLmaooo Taylor Lorentz is credible! My sides!
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·16 days ago something more substantive Yeah, let me link you to 40 minutes of glaze content. That’s how we provide evidence for things, right?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-216 days agoTo answer your question, yes this is deflection. You linked to 40 minutes of content and went “see, proof”. Just wall after wall of text and cherry picked character references and accusations of people that have nothing to do with Hasan. All typical of a Hasan viewer though, so nice work.
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·16 days agoSo it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop? Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-216 days agoAgain, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog. Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”
Lmaooo Taylor Lorentz is credible! My sides!
deleted by creator
Yeah, let me link you to 40 minutes of glaze content. That’s how we provide evidence for things, right?
deleted by creator
To answer your question, yes this is deflection.
You linked to 40 minutes of content and went “see, proof”.
Just wall after wall of text and cherry picked character references and accusations of people that have nothing to do with Hasan.
All typical of a Hasan viewer though, so nice work.
deleted by creator
So it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop?
Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
deleted by creator
Again, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog.
Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”