CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoIntellectual Debatelemmy.worldimagemessage-square144linkfedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down110
arrow-up1793arrow-down1imageIntellectual Debatelemmy.worldCultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square144linkfedilink
minus-squareLehmuusa@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 month agoA centaur has explicitly horse features until a certain point, then explicitly human features from that point onwards. That would mean the upper part not being allowed to divert back to horseness/giraffiness, as the left pic does.
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agoBut right would also be wrong, because the torso is elongated instead of the neck. I suppose a giraffe centaur would be considerably shorter than either of these images suggest.
minus-squareL3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoSo, the left pic without the long neck? Makes the most sense to me.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·30 days agoSo, the horses at Fenton’s (where the horses are hung like you) are centaurs by that definition?
A centaur has explicitly horse features until a certain point, then explicitly human features from that point onwards.
That would mean the upper part not being allowed to divert back to horseness/giraffiness, as the left pic does.
But right would also be wrong, because the torso is elongated instead of the neck.
I suppose a giraffe centaur would be considerably shorter than either of these images suggest.
So, the left pic without the long neck? Makes the most sense to me.
So, the horses at Fenton’s (where the horses are hung like you) are centaurs by that definition?