• OwlPaste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Linux will not care, if some corporate distros sell out, no matter. Just spin up any other million distros which are not [redacted]. Or just gentoo it.

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Linux is like that spider swatting meme where the spider gets squished, and then it explodes into a million smaller spiders that run every direction.

  • Corngood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every app does not need to check your birth date. An app will be able to query if the user is within one of a few broad ranges of age (e.g. under 18), but an app only has to do that if it needs to comply with some other legislation.

      • aksdb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Who exactly gains anything from forcing lets say Krita to implement an age check?

          • aksdb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The comment you answered to said not all software has to implement age checks; only those who actually deal with age relevant content. You said it would be a foot in the door. So… who’s foot to do what?

              • aksdb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                How would the current approach help?

                Its not invasive yet (no third party, no ID, no verification; its basically just another user controlled date field that is not even exposed). So it is not lowering any barrier in that regard.

                It’s also not a helpful intermediary step for harder measures, because as soon as you want a third party to do attestation, storing that on a user controlled device is just unnecessary complexity and risk of circumvention. It would be easier and safer (for those introducing it) to just let the attesting party talk to the providers directly.

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Slippery nipples!!!

        Actual bad laws are being passed, why not focus on them instead of hyperventilating about a law. That doesn’t do what people are claiming it does.