Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoHow possibly?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down11
arrow-up110arrow-down1imageHow possibly?lemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
minus-squareChippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoBut why can’t women have it?
Women?
Yes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
Why not
It’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
But why can’t women have it?