• jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So, they made it a “suggestion” to not contaminate the environment, got rid of a bunch of security requirements (Who needs security at a plant powering our cities anyway??), AND are upping the amount of radiation exposure someone can have before they seek treatment.

    So, basically a bunch of evil shit. huh, whuda’thunk the same people that saw the increased incidence of new cancers with all the PFAS in our water and food, and decided to roll back regulations on it while introducing a brand-new PFAS laden pesticide for all our crops! Wonderful! We’ll all get cancer and die early deaths because of them!

    They’re making literally everything worse, murdering us in the street, arresting dissidents, covering up their crimes, and stealing billions while they do it.

  • rb411@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Worst part of this is nuclear regulation really does need rewritten but this administration somehow finds the worst way to do everything.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank the heritage foundation and the democrats for having no plans other than weak performative bs. They’re not going to reverse any of the damage either

      • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Dude fuck your both sides horseshit. Blame the republicans for actually doing it and the voters for being too stupid and disengaged to save themselves from obvious damnation.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t see any company jumping at the rim to implement these though, especially considering the high chance that it will just be overturned next party flip. Stuff like this needs bi-partisanship and transparency otherwise it just gets revoked when the party flips again.

    it’s a waste of money until it’s clear both primary parties agree with the change, the fact it had to be done in silent/under the table says everything about the volatility of this change.